[PATCH 0/4] OMAP-GPMC generic timing migration
Afzal Mohammed
x0148406 at ti.com
Thu Oct 18 01:26:13 EDT 2012
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 17 October 2012 08:43 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 17.10.2012 07:42, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
>> I doubt whether auxdata would help here, it seems using
>> compatible field alone would help in deciding relevant
>> custom timing routine. Whether we want this kind of
>> peripheral knowledge in gpmc driver instead of using
>> generic timing routine has to be decided though.
> Another thing that might be worth thinking about is that apart from the
> GPMC host controller and the peripherals, there could be other
> components like level shifters or series resistors on the board that
> limit the maximum speed of transactions. So in fact we might be better
> off storing all that timing details in the DT, as they are in fact
> highly application specific.
Yes, making it future proof for these kind of scenarios was one
of the reason's that initially triggered generic timing path.
Regards
Afzal
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list