[PATCH V3 0/3] Add clock framework for armada 370/XP
Jason Cooper
jason at lakedaemon.net
Wed Oct 17 11:39:25 EDT 2012
Mike,
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 02:18:16PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> The v3.7-rc1 was released yesterday. So here it is the updated version
> of my patch set. The rebase was flawless. An I have just fixed a typo
> in the device tree and warnings from checkpatch. I built and test it
> for the Armada 370 and Armada XP evaluation board.
>
> The purpose of this patch set is to add support for clock framework
> for Armada 370 and Armada XP SoCs. All the support is done under the
> directory drivers/clk/mvebu/ as the support for other mvebu SoCs was
> in mind during the writing of the code.
>
> Two kinds of clocks are added:
>
> - The CPU clocks are only for Armada XP (which is multi-core)
>
> - The core clocks are clocks which have their rate fixed during
> reset.
>
> Many thanks to Thomas Petazzoni and Sebastian Hesselbarth for their
> review and feedback. The device tree bindings were really improved
> with the advices of Sebastian.
>
> Changelog:
> V2 -> V3:
> - Rebased on top of v3.7-rc1
> - Fixed a typo in device trees
> - Fixed warning from checkpatch
>
> V1 -> V2:
>
> - Improved the spelling and the wording of the documentation and the
> 1st commit log
> - Removed the "end_of_list" name which are unused here.
> - Fix the cpu clock by using of_clk_src_onecell_get in the same way it
> was used for the core clocks
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Gregory CLEMENT (3):
> clk: mvebu: add armada-370-xp specific clocks
> clk: armada-370-xp: add support for clock framework
> clocksource: time-armada-370-xp converted to clk framework
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/mvebu-core-clock.txt | 40 +++
> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/mvebu-cpu-clock.txt | 21 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-db.dts | 4 -
> arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi | 12 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp.dtsi | 48 +++
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig | 5 +
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c | 8 +-
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/common.h | 1 +
> drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/mvebu/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-core.c | 312 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-core.h | 19 ++
> drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.c | 155 ++++++++++
> drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.h | 19 ++
> drivers/clk/mvebu/clk.c | 36 +++
> drivers/clocksource/time-armada-370-xp.c | 11 +-
> 17 files changed, 685 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/mvebu-core-clock.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/mvebu-cpu-clock.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mvebu/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-core.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-core.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mvebu/clk.c
Would it be okay if we took this through the mvebu tree? It looks like
the only potential merge conflict we would have would be in
drivers/clk/Makefile. It would make dependency tracking easier.
Otherwise is fine as well, just let me know which you prefer.
Assuming, of course, everything looks good to you.
thx,
Jason.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list