[PATCH 3/4] ARM: AT91: Add AT91RM9200 support to DT board
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Fri Oct 12 12:27:06 EDT 2012
On 17:28 Fri 12 Oct , ludovic.desroches wrote:
> Le 10/12/2012 04:22 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit :
> >On 00:05 Fri 12 Oct , Joachim Eastwood wrote:
> >>Signed-off-by: Joachim Eastwood <manabian at gmail.com>
> >>---
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>This patch has some potential issues.
> >>Before this patch board-dt would fail building when only AT91RM9200 was enabled because at91sam926x_timer symbol would be missing. This patch uses the at91rm9200_timer which
> >>will fail if AT91RM9200 is not enabled.
> >this need work with ot wtihout rm9200
> >>
> >>Any thoughts on solving this? As mention above this bug exists in mainline now.
> >duplicate the board-dt with one for rm9200 only
> >as rm9200 ans sam9 are 2 distict familly
>
> Why not adding a new machine descriptor for rm9200 in order to
> prevent file duplication?
because the soc are different and can only be compile if the timer is enable
and I do not want to enable the rm9200 timer on sam9 so instead of a ifdef i
the board-dt create a new board is better as we have a 50 lines file
with different board_compat and different machine descriptor
Best Regards,
J.
>
> Regards
>
> Ludovic
>
> >>
> >>I had to create a new at91rm9200_dt_initialize since at91_dt_initialize will panic when it tries to add rstc and shdwc.
> >>Is it okay to add at91rm9200_dt_initialize or should we fix at91_dt_rstc and at91_dt_shdwc to not panic when DT nodes are not found?
> >it's ok
> >>
> >
> >can you add a board too rm9200ek will be good
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >J.
> >>regards
> >>Joachim Eastwood
> >>
> >> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >> arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h | 1 +
> >> arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c
> >>index e8f45c4..0e73317 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c
> >>@@ -45,11 +45,26 @@ static void __init at91_dt_device_init(void)
> >> of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
> >> }
> >>
> >>+static const char *at91rm9200_dt_board_compat[] __initdata = {
> >>+ "atmel,at91rm9200",
> >>+ NULL
> >>+};
> >>+
> >> static const char *at91_dt_board_compat[] __initdata = {
> >> "atmel,at91sam9",
> >> NULL
> >> };
> >>
> >>+DT_MACHINE_START(at91rm9200_dt, "Atmel AT91RM9200 (Device Tree)")
> >>+ .timer = &at91rm9200_timer,
> >>+ .map_io = at91_map_io,
> >>+ .handle_irq = at91_aic_handle_irq,
> >>+ .init_early = at91rm9200_dt_initialize,
> >>+ .init_irq = at91_dt_init_irq,
> >>+ .init_machine = at91_dt_device_init,
> >>+ .dt_compat = at91rm9200_dt_board_compat,
> >>+MACHINE_END
> >>+
> >> DT_MACHINE_START(at91sam_dt, "Atmel AT91SAM (Device Tree)")
> >> /* Maintainer: Atmel */
> >> .timer = &at91sam926x_timer,
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> >>index f496506..9bb5ce5 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> >>@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ extern void __init at91_init_sram(int bank, unsigned long base,
> >> extern void __init at91rm9200_set_type(int type);
> >> extern void __init at91_initialize(unsigned long main_clock);
> >> extern void __init at91x40_initialize(unsigned long main_clock);
> >>+extern void __init at91rm9200_dt_initialize(void);
> >> extern void __init at91_dt_initialize(void);
> >>
> >> /* Interrupts */
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> >>index da9881b..2c1fdd4 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> >>@@ -338,6 +338,7 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
> >> }
> >>
> >> static struct of_device_id ramc_ids[] = {
> >>+ { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-sdramc" },
> >> { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-sdramc" },
> >> { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-ddramc" },
> >> { /*sentinel*/ }
> >>@@ -436,6 +437,19 @@ end:
> >> of_node_put(np);
> >> }
> >>
> >>+void __init at91rm9200_dt_initialize(void)
> >>+{
> >>+ at91_dt_ramc();
> >>+
> >>+ /* Init clock subsystem */
> >>+ at91_dt_clock_init();
> >>+
> >>+ /* Register the processor-specific clocks */
> >>+ at91_boot_soc.register_clocks();
> >>+
> >>+ at91_boot_soc.init();
> >>+}
> >>+
> >> void __init at91_dt_initialize(void)
> >> {
> >> at91_dt_rstc();
> >>--
> >>1.7.12.2
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> >linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> >http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >
> >
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list