alignment faults in 3.6
Eric Dumazet
eric.dumazet at gmail.com
Thu Oct 11 07:54:16 EDT 2012
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 13:47 +0200, Maxime Bizon wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 13:28 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > You probably are aware that a driver can use :
> >
> > - a fragment to hold the frame given by the hardware, with whatever
> > alignment is needed by the hardware.
> >
> > Then allocate an skb with enough room (128 bytes) to pull the headers as
> > needed later.
> >
> > skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(dev, 128);
>
> What happen at tx time, supposing that same hardware cannot do SG ?
>
> Aren't we going to memcpy the data into the head ?
>
Of course, if you use a forwarding setup, and the tx driver is not SG
capable, performance will be bad (You have to copy the data into a
single skb (linearize the skb))
But in 2012, having to use hardware without SG for a router sounds a bad
joke (if cpu speed is _also_ too low)
Adding get_unaligned() everywhere in linux network stacks is not an
option.
We actually want to be able to read the code and fix the bugs, not only
run it on a cheap low end router.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list