[PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Add support for ST-Ericsson's u9540 SoC

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 08:38 Thu 11 Oct     , Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> 
> > On 16:18 Wed 10 Oct     , Lee Jones wrote:
> > > First level board support for the u9540.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
> > > index 3d8e321..6b7f970 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > >  #include <linux/io.h>
> > >  #include <linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > >  #include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
> > > @@ -319,6 +320,8 @@ static void __init u8500_init_machine(void)
> > >  		snowball_pinmaps_init();
> > >  	else if (of_machine_is_compatible("st-ericsson,hrefv60+"))
> > >  		hrefv60_pinmaps_init();
> > > +	else if (of_machine_is_compatible("st-ericsson,u9540")) {}
> > > +		/* TODO: Add u9540 pinmaps. */
> > do you via DT no here
> 
> We don't support pinctrl yet. It will come, it's just not available yet.
so stop to add more and update the drviers

and u9540 is a SoC name not a baord name
> 
> > >  	/* TODO: Export SoC, USB, cpu-freq and DMA40 */
> > >  	parent = u8500_of_init_devices();
> > > @@ -331,6 +334,7 @@ static const char * u8500_dt_board_compat[] = {
> > >  	"calaosystems,snowball-a9500",
> > >  	"st-ericsson,hrefv60+",
> > >  	"st-ericsson,mop500",
> > > +	"st-ericsson,u9540",
> > stop to add more compatible sue a more generic one
> 
> Not entirely sure what you mean here.
> 
> These are the only four boards we officially support.
> 
> There are other uXXXX boards that we do not.
you do not need it just mach a global compatbile
> 
> > >  	NULL,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > @@ -345,4 +349,14 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(U8500_DT, "ST-Ericsson U8500 platform (Device Tree Support)")
> > >  	.dt_compat      = u8500_dt_board_compat,
> > >  MACHINE_END
> > >  
> > > +DT_MACHINE_START(U9540_DT, "ST-Ericsson 9540 platform (Device Tree Support)")
> > > +	.map_io		= u8500_map_io,
> > > +	.init_irq	= ux500_init_irq,
> > > +	.timer		= &ux500_timer,
> > > +	.handle_irq	= gic_handle_irq,
> > > +	.init_machine	= u8500_init_machine,
> > > +	.init_late	= NULL,
> > > +	.dt_compat      = u8500_dt_board_compat,
> > > +MACHINE_END
> > really?
> > no need drop it for a more generic on
> 
> This may look the same as the previous MACHINE_START now, but
> it will have differences in the future as more u9540 support is
> upstreamed. I think it should stick around as a separate entity
> for the time being. If we can consolidate the init functions at
> a later date, believe me I will make sure it happens.
> 
> -- 
> Lee Jones
> Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog