[PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Add support for ST-Ericsson's u9540 SoC

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Wed Oct 10 15:01:44 EDT 2012


On 16:18 Wed 10 Oct     , Lee Jones wrote:
> First level board support for the u9540.
> 
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
> index 3d8e321..6b7f970 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
> @@ -319,6 +320,8 @@ static void __init u8500_init_machine(void)
>  		snowball_pinmaps_init();
>  	else if (of_machine_is_compatible("st-ericsson,hrefv60+"))
>  		hrefv60_pinmaps_init();
> +	else if (of_machine_is_compatible("st-ericsson,u9540")) {}
> +		/* TODO: Add u9540 pinmaps. */
do you via DT no here
>  
>  	/* TODO: Export SoC, USB, cpu-freq and DMA40 */
>  	parent = u8500_of_init_devices();
> @@ -331,6 +334,7 @@ static const char * u8500_dt_board_compat[] = {
>  	"calaosystems,snowball-a9500",
>  	"st-ericsson,hrefv60+",
>  	"st-ericsson,mop500",
> +	"st-ericsson,u9540",
stop to add more compatible sue a more generic one
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  
> @@ -345,4 +349,14 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(U8500_DT, "ST-Ericsson U8500 platform (Device Tree Support)")
>  	.dt_compat      = u8500_dt_board_compat,
>  MACHINE_END
>  
> +DT_MACHINE_START(U9540_DT, "ST-Ericsson 9540 platform (Device Tree Support)")
> +	.map_io		= u8500_map_io,
> +	.init_irq	= ux500_init_irq,
> +	.timer		= &ux500_timer,
> +	.handle_irq	= gic_handle_irq,
> +	.init_machine	= u8500_init_machine,
> +	.init_late	= NULL,
> +	.dt_compat      = u8500_dt_board_compat,
> +MACHINE_END
really?
no need drop it for a more generic on

Best Regards,
J.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list