[PATCH v2 2/7] ARM: virt: allow the kernel to be entered in HYP mode
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Mon Oct 8 07:33:03 EDT 2012
On 08/10/12 12:01, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:00:32AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com> [121006 03:19]:
>>>
>>> If so, that indicates some side effect of the safe_svcmode_maskall macro,
>>> and I suspect the "movs pc, lr" bit.
>>>
>>> Can you try the attached patch? It basically falls back to the previous
>>> behaviour if not entered in HYP mode.
>> ...
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
>>> index 658a15d..b21b97f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
>>> @@ -254,16 +254,17 @@
>>> mov lr , \reg
>>> and lr , lr , #MODE_MASK
>>> cmp lr , #HYP_MODE
>>> - orr \reg , \reg , #PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT
>>> + orr \reg , \reg , #PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT
>>> bic \reg , \reg , #MODE_MASK
>>> orr \reg , \reg , #SVC_MODE
>>> THUMB( orr \reg , \reg , #PSR_T_BIT )
>>> - msr spsr_cxsf, \reg
>>> - adr lr, BSYM(2f)
>>> bne 1f
>>> + orr \reg, \reg, #PSR_A_BIT
>>> + adr lr, BSYM(2f)
>>> + msr spsr_cxsf, \reg
>>> __MSR_ELR_HYP(14)
>>> __ERET
>>> -1: movs pc, lr
>>> +1: msr cpsr_c, \reg
>>> 2:
>>> .endm
>>>
>>
>> The minimal version of this that still boots on my n800 is just
>> the last change of the above patch:
>>
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
>> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ THUMB( orr \reg , \reg , #PSR_T_BIT )
>> bne 1f
>> __MSR_ELR_HYP(14)
>> __ERET
>> -1: movs pc, lr
>> +1: msr cpsr_c, \reg
>> 2:
>> .endm
>>
>
> In an attempt to narrow this down...
>
> Can you follow this (i.e., _after_ a known successful switch to SVC mode)
>
> (a)
> mrs \reg, cpsr
> msr spsr_cxsf, \reg
> adr \reg, 3f
> movs pc, lr
> 3:
>
> and (b)
>
> mrs \reg, cpsr
> orr \reg, \reg, #CPSR_A_BIT
> msr cpsr_cxsf, \reg
>
> and (c)
>
> mrs \reg, cpsr
> orr \reg, \reg, #CPSR_A_BIT
> msr spsr_cxsf, \reg
> adr \reg, 3f
> movs pc, lr
> 3:
>
>
>
>
> If only (a) works, this would suggest that the attempt to set the A bit
> is causing the problem.
>
> If only (b) works, this suggests that the A bit is OK but that some
> invalid hardware state, or something else we don't understand, is causing
> exception returns to fail in general.
>
> If (a) and (b) work but (c) fails, this suggests that specifically
> trying to set the A bit via an exception return is problematic.
>
> If all of them work then this suggests some invalid hardware state or
> something else we don't understand, but which is cleared by the initial
> msr cpsr_c which clobbers the processor mode.
Playing with an Integrator-CP with a 1136 tile, the only way I could
cause the thing to fail was to boot the thing in SYSTEM mode.
Tony, can you possibly also try the attached patch?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sysmode.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 593 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121008/d1635b08/attachment.bin>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list