[PATCH v2 06/14] KVM: ARM: Memory virtualization setup
Christoffer Dall
c.dall at virtualopensystems.com
Sat Oct 6 17:33:43 EDT 2012
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Min-gyu Kim <mingyu84.kim at samsung.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kvm-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-owner at vger.kernel.org] On
>> Behalf Of Christoffer Dall
>> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 6:11 PM
>> To: kvm at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
>> kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 06/14] KVM: ARM: Memory virtualization setup
>>
>> +static void stage2_set_pte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache
>> *cache,
>> + phys_addr_t addr, const pte_t *new_pte) {
>> + pgd_t *pgd;
>> + pud_t *pud;
>> + pmd_t *pmd;
>> + pte_t *pte, old_pte;
>> +
>> + /* Create 2nd stage page table mapping - Level 1 */
>> + pgd = kvm->arch.pgd + pgd_index(addr);
>> + pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
>> + if (pud_none(*pud)) {
>> + if (!cache)
>> + return; /* ignore calls from kvm_set_spte_hva */
>> + pmd = mmu_memory_cache_alloc(cache);
>> + pud_populate(NULL, pud, pmd);
>> + pmd += pmd_index(addr);
>> + get_page(virt_to_page(pud));
>> + } else
>> + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
>> +
>> + /* Create 2nd stage page table mapping - Level 2 */
>> + if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
>> + if (!cache)
>> + return; /* ignore calls from kvm_set_spte_hva */
>> + pte = mmu_memory_cache_alloc(cache);
>> + clean_pte_table(pte);
>> + pmd_populate_kernel(NULL, pmd, pte);
>> + pte += pte_index(addr);
>> + get_page(virt_to_page(pmd));
>> + } else
>> + pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
>> +
>> + /* Create 2nd stage page table mapping - Level 3 */
>> + old_pte = *pte;
>> + set_pte_ext(pte, *new_pte, 0);
>> + if (pte_present(old_pte))
>> + __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(kvm);
>> + else
>> + get_page(virt_to_page(pte));
>> +}
>
>
> I'm not sure about the 3-level page table, but isn't it necessary to
> clean the page table for 2nd level?
> There are two mmu_memory_cache_alloc calls. One has following clean_pte_table
> and the other doesn't have.
hmm, it probably is - I couldn't really find the common case where
this is done in the kernel normally (except for some custom loop in
ioremap and idmap), but I added this fix:
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
index 5394a52..f11ba27f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ static void stage2_set_pte(struct kvm *kvm, struct
kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
if (!cache)
return; /* ignore calls from kvm_set_spte_hva */
pmd = mmu_memory_cache_alloc(cache);
+ clean_dcache_area(pmd, PTRS_PER_PMD * sizeof(pmd_t));
pud_populate(NULL, pud, pmd);
pmd += pmd_index(addr);
get_page(virt_to_page(pud));
>
> And why do you ignore calls from kvm_set_spte_hva? It is supposed to happen when
> host moves the page, right? Then you ignore the case because it can be handled
> later when fault actually happens? Is there any other reason that I miss?
>
kvm_set_spte_hva tells us that a page at some IPA is going to be
backed by another physical page, which means we must adjust the stage
2 mapping. However, if we don't have that page mapped in the stage 2
page table, we don't need to do anything, and certainly don't want to
start allocating unnecessary level2 and level3 page tables.
Thanks!
-Christoffer
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list