alignment faults in 3.6
Rob Herring
robherring2 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 4 19:10:26 EDT 2012
I've been scratching my head with a "scheduling while atomic" bug I
started seeing on 3.6. I can easily reproduce this problem when doing a
wget on my system. It ultimately seems to be a combination of factors.
The "scheduling while atomic" bug is triggered in do_alignment which
gets triggered by this code in net/ipv4/af_inet.c, line 1356:
id = ntohl(*(__be32 *)&iph->id);
flush = (u16)((ntohl(*(__be32 *)iph) ^ skb_gro_len(skb)) | (id ^ IP_DF));
id >>= 16;
This code compiles into this using "gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro
4.6.3-1ubuntu5)":
c02ac020: e8920840 ldm r2, {r6, fp}
c02ac024: e6bfbf3b rev fp, fp
c02ac028: e6bf6f36 rev r6, r6
c02ac02c: e22bc901 eor ip, fp, #16384 ; 0x4000
c02ac030: e0266008 eor r6, r6, r8
c02ac034: e18c6006 orr r6, ip, r6
which generates alignment faults on the ldm. These are silent until this
commit is applied:
commit ad72907acd2943304c292ae36960bb66e6dc23c9
Author: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
Date: Fri Sep 7 18:24:10 2012 +0100
ARM: 7528/1: uaccess: annotate [__]{get,put}_user functions with
might_fault()
The user access functions may generate a fault, resulting in invocation
of a handler that may sleep.
This patch annotates the accessors with might_fault() so that we print a
warning if they are invoked from atomic context and help lockdep keep
track of mmap_sem.
I would think the scheduling while atomic messages are harmless in this
case. However, in addition to spewing out BUG messages this commit also
seems to eventually cause a kernel panic in __napi_complete. That panic
seems to go away if I put barrier() between the 2 accesses above which
eliminates the alignment faults. I haven't figured that part out yet.
There's at least a couple of problems here:
This seems like an overly aggressive compiler optimization considering
unaligned accesses are not supported by ldm/stm.
The alignment fault handler should handle kernel address faults atomically.
I need to fix alignment of the network rx buffers if possible.
Rob
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list