[PATCH 2/2] mtd: sh_flctl: Add device tree support

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 02 October 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > 
> > Since you are also adding dma-engine support, I would suggest you specify
> > a "dmas" and "dma-names" property as well, so the device can find the
> > right dma channel. The code might not do that yet while you're still
> > sorting out the dependencies (and the sh dmaengine code is not yet
> > converted to DT), but I think it would be good to nail down the binding
> > for this device.
> 
> Have DMA DT bindings been accepted yet, are they fixed? Wouldn't it be 
> better to wait until patches appear in a tree, at least with high 
> probability heading towards the mainline, or have they already?
> 

I think they ended up not getting scheduled for 3.7, which is a bit disappointing
after we got an agreement on the binding.  However, I am rather confident that
we won't change the binding again, at least I don't see how they would change
in a way that would impact the binding document for a device using a DMA channel.

	Arnd