[PATCH v4 07/14] KVM: ARM: Inject IRQs and FIQs from userspace
Will Deacon
will.deacon at arm.com
Mon Nov 19 09:55:46 EST 2012
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 03:42:59PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> From: Christoffer Dall <cdall at cs.columbia.edu>
>
> All interrupt injection is now based on the VM ioctl KVM_IRQ_LINE. This
> works semantically well for the GIC as we in fact raise/lower a line on
> a machine component (the gic). The IOCTL uses the follwing struct.
>
> struct kvm_irq_level {
> union {
> __u32 irq; /* GSI */
> __s32 status; /* not used for KVM_IRQ_LEVEL */
> };
> __u32 level; /* 0 or 1 */
> };
>
> ARM can signal an interrupt either at the CPU level, or at the in-kernel irqchip
> (GIC), and for in-kernel irqchip can tell the GIC to use PPIs designated for
> specific cpus. The irq field is interpreted like this:
>
> bits: | 31 ... 24 | 23 ... 16 | 15 ... 0 |
> field: | irq_type | vcpu_index | irq_number |
>
> The irq_type field has the following values:
> - irq_type[0]: out-of-kernel GIC: irq_number 0 is IRQ, irq_number 1 is FIQ
> - irq_type[1]: in-kernel GIC: SPI, irq_number between 32 and 1019 (incl.)
> (the vcpu_index field is ignored)
> - irq_type[2]: in-kernel GIC: PPI, irq_number between 16 and 31 (incl.)
>
> The irq_number thus corresponds to the irq ID in as in the GICv2 specs.
>
> This is documented in Documentation/kvm/api.txt.
>
> Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti at redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <c.dall at virtualopensystems.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 5ac3132..15e2ab1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/mman.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
>
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> @@ -272,6 +273,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
> {
> + vcpu->cpu = cpu;
> }
>
> void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -312,6 +314,74 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static int vcpu_interrupt_line(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int number, bool level)
> +{
> + int bit_index;
> + bool set;
> + unsigned long *ptr;
> +
> + if (number == KVM_ARM_IRQ_CPU_IRQ)
> + bit_index = __ffs(HCR_VI);
> + else /* KVM_ARM_IRQ_CPU_FIQ */
> + bit_index = __ffs(HCR_VF);
> +
> + ptr = (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.irq_lines;
> + if (level)
> + set = test_and_set_bit(bit_index, ptr);
> + else
> + set = test_and_clear_bit(bit_index, ptr);
> +
> + /*
> + * If we didn't change anything, no need to wake up or kick other CPUs
> + */
> + if (set == level)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * The vcpu irq_lines field was updated, wake up sleeping VCPUs and
> + * trigger a world-switch round on the running physical CPU to set the
> + * virtual IRQ/FIQ fields in the HCR appropriately.
> + */
> + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level)
> +{
> + u32 irq = irq_level->irq;
> + unsigned int irq_type, vcpu_idx, irq_num;
> + int nrcpus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
> + bool level = irq_level->level;
> +
> + irq_type = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_MASK;
> + vcpu_idx = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK;
> + irq_num = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_NUM_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_NUM_MASK;
> +
> + trace_kvm_irq_line(irq_type, vcpu_idx, irq_num, irq_level->level);
> +
> + if (irq_type == KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_CPU ||
> + irq_type == KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_PPI) {
> + if (vcpu_idx >= nrcpus)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_idx);
> + if (!vcpu)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + switch (irq_type) {
> + case KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_CPU:
> + if (irq_num > KVM_ARM_IRQ_CPU_FIQ)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return vcpu_interrupt_line(vcpu, irq_num, level);
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
Holy cyclomatic complexity Batman! Any way this can be cleaned up?
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list