[PATCH 1/3] gpio: Add simple poweroff-gpio driver

Linus Walleij linus.walleij at linaro.org
Thu Nov 15 05:35:36 EST 2012

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 11/12/2012 11:43 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:

>> Should the gpio driver fix its bindings then?.. Polarity is a quite
>> generic concept of a GPIO, and flags are there for a reason. I'd rather
>> prefer having
> There is no "GPIO driver" to fix; each GPIO driver has its own bindings,
> and unfortunately, some of the GPIO binding authors chose not to include
> any flags cell in the GPIO specifier (e.g. Samsung ARM SoCs IIRC, but
> there are probably more).

So can I read this something like we have been too liberal with the
GPIO DT bindings and they are now a bit messy and need to be shaped
up? I don't know how to achieve that :-(

Alerting Grant to see if he has something to add on this subject...

Linus Walleij

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list