[PATCH v2 00/26] Move OMAP2+ over to common clk framework

[Tony Lindgren]

Hi,

* Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org> [121107 17:33]:
> Doh, I got the LAKML address wrong...
> 
> Thankfully it's already up on some archives:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/88824
> 
> For anyone interested in testing:
> git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git clk-omap-3.8
> 
> Regards,
> Mike
> 
> Quoting Mike Turquette (2012-11-07 17:12:35)
> > From: Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org>
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > This series is based on top of Paul's PRM/CM clean-up work.  It is a
> > refresh of the patches Rajendra sent out a while back[1], with the
> > addition of several fixes for PM regressions[2] across several
> > platforms.
> > 
> > I have tested on OMAP4430 Panda including PRCM diffing against pre-CCF
> > patches (delta is zero) and also suspend/resume.
> > 
> > I also tested on OMAP4460 Panda-ES.  Boot is fine and PRCM programming
> > appears sane.  However Panda-ES never comes back from suspend/resume.
> > This problem exists on the PRM/CM branch I based on and was not
> > introduced by this series.  I am investigating that independently of
> > this series.

Cool! Do we still have some omaps that have issues booting with
these?

Regards,

Tony


> > Anyone wanting to pull the work can find it at:
> > git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git clk-omap-3.8
> > 
> > [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/78771
> > [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/84015