[RFC PATCH] clk: add extension API

[Felipe Balbi]

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:57:23PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Well, that's just because struct device doesn't know about its own clock
> > providers, right ? Should that be patched too ?
> > 
> > Russell, as the orignal author of the clk API, what do you think ?
> 
> Even if it would know, how would that solve the problem? only the
> clockframework is supposed to know about struct clk.

you have the device and you have the clock, you need to toggle a bit on
the clock address space. I guess that pretty much says it, no ? Unless
your implementation of struct clk doesn't tell you clk register offset
which is rather unlikely.

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120531/1cc895c9/attachment.sig>