[PATCH 13/20] arm: Do not call try_to_freeze() in do_signal()
Richard Weinberger
richard at nod.at
Fri May 25 18:04:29 EDT 2012
get_signal_to_deliver() already calls try_to_freeze(), there is no
need to call it directly.
Cc: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard at nod.at>
---
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 5 -----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
index 434a1f3..aeebb46 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <linux/personality.h>
-#include <linux/freezer.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/tracehook.h>
#include <linux/irqflags.h>
@@ -636,9 +635,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall)
}
}
- if (try_to_freeze())
- goto no_signal;
-
/*
* Get the signal to deliver. When running under ptrace, at this
* point the debugger may change all our registers ...
@@ -678,7 +674,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall)
return;
}
- no_signal:
if (syscall) {
/*
* Handle restarting a different system call. As above,
--
1.7.7.3
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list