kirkwood, nand, clocks and device-tree

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 07:33:37AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 21 May 2012, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:35:06PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > > > board/<boardname>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Do you mean old style, none DT, boards?
> > > > 
> > > > No, new DT boards.
> > > 
> > > O.K. Then a better name would be dt-board/<boardname>
> > 
> > Well, no new boards are being accepted without DT support.  However, I
> > have no strong opinion on the matter, so dt-board/ it is, then.
> 
> Just one branch should be enough for all the boards, I think. As soon
> as you have the gpio bindings taken care of, the board specific parts
> will shrink significantly anyway.

Ok, sounds good.

thx,

Jason.