[PATCH v2 05/12] usb: chipidea: add imx driver binding
Richard Zhao
richard.zhao at freescale.com
Tue May 22 00:51:21 EDT 2012
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 06:30:56AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Richard Zhao,
>
> > Just add host support.
>
> Maybe rephrase it to something like "This patch supports only the host-mode
> functionality so far."
Thanks.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao at freescale.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> > Cc: Peter Chen <peter.chen at freescale.com>
> > Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt | 20 ++
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/Makefile | 8 +
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c | 191
> > ++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt
> > create mode 100644 drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt new file mode
> > 100644
> > index 0000000..beb75d6
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > +* Freescale i.MX ci13xxx usb controllers
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: Should be "fsl,imx31-usb"
> > +- reg: Should contain registers location and length
> > +- interrupts: Should contain controller interrupt
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- fsl,usbphy: phandler of usb phy that connects to the only one port
> > +- fsl,hub-reset-gpios: gpio used to reset on-board usb hub
> > +- fsl,vbus-power-gpios: gpio used to set vbus power of the only one port
> > +
> > +Examples:
> > +usb at 02184000 { /* USB OTG */
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx6q-usb", "fsl,imx31-usb";
> > + reg = <0x02184000 0x200>;
> > + interrupts = <0 43 0x04>;
> > + fsl,usbphy = <&usbphy1>;
> > + fsl,vbus-power-gpios = <&gpio3 22 0>;
> > +};
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Makefile b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Makefile
> > index cc34937..ffa2f63 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Makefile
> > @@ -12,3 +12,11 @@ endif
> > ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM),)
> > obj-$(CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA) += ci13xxx_msm.o
> > endif
> > +
> > +ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC),)
> > + obj-$(CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA) += ci13xxx_imx.o
> > +else
> > + ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_MXS),)
> > + obj-$(CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA) += ci13xxx_imx.o
> > + endif
> > +endif
>
> I think someone commented on these patches (my previous set of patches
> actually), that this should be fixed in a way that you can actually select which
> bindings you want to compile in (and not limit it via Makefile like it's now).
Yes. I think you're right.
Alexander,
Do you think it's a good idea to let user select binding driver directly
and the binding driver config depends on chipidea config?
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
> > b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..9f64b3c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> > + * on behalf of DENX Software Engineering GmbH
> > + *
> > + * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public
> > + * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License
> > + * Version 2 or later at the following locations:
> > + *
> > + * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html
> > + * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > +#include <linux/usb/chipidea.h>
> > +#include <linux/usb/ehci_def.h>
> > +#include <linux/usb/gadget.h>
> > +#include <linux/usb/chipidea.h>
> > +#include <linux/usb/otg.h>
> > +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/string.h>
> > +
> > +#include "ci.h"
> > +
> > +#define PORT0_STATUS 0x184
> > +
> > +#define pdev_to_phy(pdev) \
> > + ((struct usb_phy *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev))
> > +
> > +struct ci13xxx_imx_data {
> > + struct device_node *phy_np;
> > + struct usb_phy *phy;
> > + struct platform_device *ci_pdev;
> > + struct clk *clk;
> > + int gpio_hub_rst, gpio_vbus_pwr;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct ci13xxx_udc_driver ci13xxx_imx_udc_driver __devinitdata = {
> > + .name = "ci13xxx_imx",
> > + .flags = CI13XXX_REQUIRE_TRANSCEIVER |
> > + CI13XXX_PULLUP_ON_VBUS |
> > + CI13XXX_DISABLE_STREAMING,
> > + .capoffset = DEF_CAPOFFSET,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __devinit ci13xxx_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct ci13xxx_imx_data *data;
> > + struct platform_device *plat_ci, *phy_pdev;
> > + struct platform_device_info ci_pdevinfo;
> > + struct device_node *phy_np;
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + int vbus_pwr;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!data) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to allocate CI13xxx-IMX data!\n");
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > + data->gpio_hub_rst = -1;
ah, I should remove hub reset here.
> > + data->gpio_vbus_pwr = -1;
>
> This really freaks me out. Maybe we should have some kind of a regulator that
> manages the VBUS and let this driver toggle the regulator when fitting? That'd
> solve the problem to some extent, as other people would be able to supply NOP
> regulator.
Good point. It looks like we still lack gpio controlled fixed regulator
driver.
>
> > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > + if (!res) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get device resources!\n");
>
> Can't ... capital "C" ;-)
thanks.
>
> > + return -ENOENT;
> > + }
> > +
> > + data->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > + if (IS_ERR(data->clk)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get clock!\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(data->clk);
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->clk);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to prepare or enable clock!\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + phy_np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "fsl,usbphy", 0);
> > + if (phy_np) {
> > + data->phy_np = phy_np;
> > + phy_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(phy_np);
> > + if (phy_pdev) {
> > + struct usb_phy *phy;
>
> Do we really want to define new variables in the middle of a code?
It's not a problem in kernel using gcc. You can find the style though
the kernel.
>
> > + phy = pdev_to_phy(phy_pdev);
> > + if (phy &&
> > + try_module_get(phy_pdev->dev.driver->owner)) {
> > + usb_phy_init(phy);
> > + data->phy = phy;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* we only support host now, so enable vbus here */
> > + vbus_pwr = of_get_named_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node,
> > + "fsl,vbus-power-gpios", 0);
>
> (This one is for my personal enlightment) Why is the property called "gpios"
> (plural) if it's only one GPIO?
It's just DT naming method. It can follow a gpio array.
>
> > + if (gpio_is_valid(vbus_pwr) &&
> > + !devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, vbus_pwr, "vbus-pwr")) {
> > + gpio_direction_output(vbus_pwr, 1);
> > + data->gpio_hub_rst = vbus_pwr;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ci13xxx_imx_udc_driver.phy = data->phy;
> > + memset(&ci_pdevinfo, 0, sizeof(ci_pdevinfo));
> > + ci_pdevinfo.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > + ci_pdevinfo.name = "ci_hdrc";
> > + ci_pdevinfo.id = (int)res->start;
> > + ci_pdevinfo.res = pdev->resource;
> > + ci_pdevinfo.num_res = pdev->num_resources;
> > + ci_pdevinfo.data = &ci13xxx_imx_udc_driver;
> > + ci_pdevinfo.size_data = sizeof(ci13xxx_imx_udc_driver);
> > + ci_pdevinfo.dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> > +
> > + plat_ci = platform_device_register_full(&ci_pdevinfo);
> > + if (IS_ERR(plat_ci)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't register ci_hdrc platform device\n");
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(plat_ci);
> > + goto put_np;
> > + }
> > +
> > + data->ci_pdev = plat_ci;
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> > +
> > + pm_runtime_no_callbacks(&pdev->dev);
> > + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +put_np:
> > + if (phy_np)
> > + of_node_put(phy_np);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __devexit ci13xxx_imx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct ci13xxx_imx_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > + kfree(data->ci_pdev->dev.dma_mask);
> > + data->ci_pdev->dev.dma_mask = NULL;
> > + platform_device_unregister(data->ci_pdev);
> > +
> > + if (data->gpio_vbus_pwr != -1)
> > + gpio_direction_output(data->gpio_vbus_pwr, 0);
> > + if (data->gpio_hub_rst != -1)
> > + gpio_direction_output(data->gpio_hub_rst, 0);
> > +
> > + if (data->phy) {
> > + usb_phy_shutdown(data->phy);
> > + module_put(data->phy->dev->driver->owner);
> > + }
> > +
> > + of_node_put(data->phy_np);
> > +
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk);
> > +
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id ci13xxx_imx_dt_ids[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx31-usb", },
>
> Wow, now it's imx31-usb ?
Yes. we discussed that imx31 is the first SoC that use this IP.
>
> > + { /* sentinel */ }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver ci13xxx_imx_driver = {
> > + .probe = ci13xxx_imx_probe,
> > + .remove = __devexit_p(ci13xxx_imx_remove),
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "imx_usb",
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .of_match_table = ci13xxx_imx_dt_ids,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_platform_driver(ci13xxx_imx_driver);
> > +
>
> Richard, thanks for your work on these patches so far. Sorry for taking so long
> with reviewing these.
My pleasure! Thanks for your review too!
Richard
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list