[PATCH 4/4] MXS-MMC: Add wp-inverted property
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Mon May 21 13:38:27 EDT 2012
Dear Lothar Waßmann,
> Hi,
>
> Marek Vasut writes:
> > The write-protect GPIO is inverted on some boards. Handle such case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam at freescale.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mxs-mmc.txt | 1 +
> > drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mxs-mmc.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mxs-mmc.txt index
> > 14d870a..0a7d2cd 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mxs-mmc.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mxs-mmc.txt
> >
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Required properties:
> > Optional properties:
> > - wp-gpios: Specify GPIOs for write protection
> >
> > +- wp-inverted: Set if the write protection GPIO is inverted
> >
> > Examples:
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> > index 277161d..119beb9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> > @@ -164,16 +164,23 @@ struct mxs_mmc_host {
> >
> > spinlock_t lock;
> > int sdio_irq_en;
> > int wp_gpio;
> >
> > + int wp_inverted:1;
> >
> > };
> >
> > static int mxs_mmc_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> > {
> >
> > struct mxs_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> >
> > + int ret;
> >
> > if (!gpio_is_valid(host->wp_gpio))
> >
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - return gpio_get_value(host->wp_gpio);
> > + ret = gpio_get_value(host->wp_gpio);
> > +
> > + if (host->wp_inverted)
> > + ret = !ret;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> >
> > }
> >
> > static int mxs_mmc_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> >
> > @@ -786,6 +793,8 @@ static int mxs_mmc_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> > else if (bus_width == 8)
> >
> > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> >
> > host->wp_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "wp-gpios", 0);
> >
> > + if (of_find_property(np, "wp-inverted", NULL))
> > + host->wp_inverted = 1;
>
> Why not simply specify the GPIO in question as being active-low in the
> GPIO definition and use of_get_named_gpio_flags()?
Just followed the cd-inverted pattern. Thanks for the hint, will poke into it.
>
> Lothar Waßmann
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list