[PATCH] arm: Add basic support for new Marvell Armada SoC family
Andrew Lunn
andrew at lunn.ch
Wed May 16 07:36:28 EDT 2012
Hi Lior
Thanks for the list.
> I'll try to arrange our SoCs (EBU):
>
> Orion family:
> Flavors:
> 5082, 5181, 5181L, 5281, 6183, ...
> Core: ARMv5 compatible (Feroceon and Jolteon)
> Process: 90nm
> Directory: mach-orion5x
mach-orion5x also supports 5182, which is not on your list.
> Kirkwood family:
> Flavors:
> 6190, 6192, ...
> Core: ARMv5 compatible (Gandalf)
> Process: 65nm
> Directory: mach-kirkwood
>
> 6282 a.k.a Kirkwood 55, Armada 300
> 6283 a.k.a Kirkwood 55, Armada 310
> Core: ARMv5 compatible (Gandalf)
> Process: 55nm
> Directory: not in mainline, future plan
mach-kirkwood supports 6180 6190 6192 6281 6282
6180 and 6281 are not on your list.
>
> 6710 a.k.a Kirkwood 40, Armada 370
> Core: ARMv7 compatible (PJ4B)
> Process: 40nm
> Directory: new code
>
> Discovery family:
> Flavors:
> 78100/78200 a.k.a DiscoDuo
> Core: ARMv5 compatible (Gandalf)
> Process: 65nm
> Directory: mach-mv78xx0
>
> 78230/78260/78460 a.k.a DiscoSMP, Armada XP
> Core: ARMv7 compatible (PJ4B)
> Process: 40nm
> Directory: new code
>
> Avanta family: (a.k.a Kirkwood 2)
> Flavors:
> 6560/60, 6530P, 6510
> Core: ARMv5 compatible (Gandalf)
> Process: 55nm
> Directory: no code in mainline yet, future plan
>
> Dove: (application processor)
> Flavors:
> ap510 a.k.a Armada 510
> Core: ARMv7 compatible (PJ4)
> Process: 65nm
> Directory: mach-dove
Is there any logic to the names/numbers?
Thanks
Andrew
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list