[PATCH] serial: samsung: Fixed wrong comparison for baudclk_rate
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Tue May 15 06:15:41 EDT 2012
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:13:28PM +0900, Kyoungil Kim wrote:
> port->baudclk_rate should be compared to the rate of port->baudclk,
> because port->baudclk_rate was assigned as the rate of port->baudclk previously.
> So to check that the current baudclk rate is same as previous rate,
> the target of comparison sholud be the rate of port->baudclk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jun-Ho, Yoon <junho78.yoon at samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyoungil Kim <ki0351.kim at samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> index d8b0aee..c4867ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> @@ -1014,10 +1014,10 @@ static int s3c24xx_serial_cpufreq_transition(struct notifier_block *nb,
> * a disturbance in the clock-rate over the change.
> */
>
> - if (IS_ERR(port->clk))
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(port->baudclk))
NAK. See my previous emails on the validity of clk_get() return values.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list