[PATCH 01/11] OMAP2+: Add SoC specific map_io functions
nico at fluxnic.net
Mon May 14 15:55:04 EDT 2012
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Salut Thomas,
> Sorry for the delay.
> On 5/4/2012 5:59 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Hello Benoit,
> > Le Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:23:09 +0200,
> > Benoit Cousson<b-cousson at ti.com> a écrit :
> > > Add SoC specific map_io function to be used by the generic DT
> > > board file. This is an intermediate step before having some
> > > generic DT aware map_io function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson at ti.com>
> > > Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony at atomide.com>
> > Do you know if some progress has been made on having a generic DT aware
> > map_io function, or is the per-SoC ->map_io() function still the
> > recommended way of handling SoC having different requirements of static
> > mappings at boot time?
> Mmm, Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm not sure people are really pushing to store that
> inside DT. But to be honest, I don't really know :-)
In general, static vs dynamic IO mappings are just some Linux
implementation details. This distinction does not belong in DT.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel