[GIT PULL] ep93xx fixes for 3.5

[Olof Johansson]

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:15 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Ryan Mallon <rmallon at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > The following changes since commit 0034102808e0dbbf3a2394b82b1bb40b5778de9e:
>> >
>> >  Linux 3.4-rc2 (2012-04-07 18:30:41 -0700)
>> >
>> > are available in the git repository at:
>> >
>> >  git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git tags/ep93xx-fixes-for-3.5
>> >
>> > for you to fetch changes up to 2b3c83efc9a653af6a24799eeb1a2900ba0439e6:
>> >
>> >  dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels (2012-04-20 08:37:19 +1000)
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Rafal Prylowski (2):
>> >      arm: ep93xx: Don't try to release not acquired GPIO lines
>> >      dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels
>>
>> Technically, this is a feature, not a fix. I also didn't see an ack
>> from the DMA maintainer on it since it would normally go in through
>> his tree.
>>
>> Vinod, you OK with this coming through arm-soc? Looks fairly
>> uncontroversial so it shouldn't be a big deal but I don't know if it
>> might collide with anything else you have queued up.
> Looks okay to me.
> For: dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA
> channels
>
> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at linux.intel.com>


Thanks!

Ryan, since the branch has one board fix and one driver feature, I
pulled it into our next/drivers branch instead of fixes. Either way,
it's queued for the merge window now.



-Olof