[PATCH-V2] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class
Hiremath, Vaibhav
hvaibhav at ti.com
Thu May 10 14:18:22 EDT 2012
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 23:35:36, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> [120510 11:06]:
> > * Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> [120509 11:58]:
> > > * Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav at ti.com> [120509 04:28]:
> > > > Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall
> > > > under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries
> > > > Cortex-A8 core. But while adding complete baseport support
> > > > (like, clock, power and hwmod) support, it is observed that,
> > > > we are creating more and more problems by treating am33xx device
> > > > as omap3 family, as nothing matches between them
> > > > (except cortex-A8 mpu).
> > >
> > > Thanks applying into devel-soc after updating for soc_is change
> > > and fixing typo in the description that stil said OMAPAM. Updated
> > > patch below.
> >
> > Turns out we still need to add defined(CONFIG_SOC_AM33XX) around
> > __omap2_set_globals() to keep compile working when omap4 + am33xx
> > are selected without omap2 or 3. Also removed the "default y"
> > for am33xx as that's where we're heading to anyways.
> >
> > Updated patch below.
>
> Argh, now it breaks with:
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap2_set_globals_am33xx':
> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1dd8): undefined reference to `omap2_set_globals_sdrc'
>
> There are clearly some dependencies to the clean up patches being
> discussed.. So I'll drop this for now until the clean up is sorted
> out.
>
All cleanup patches which I have posted should resolve these issues.
Do you see any issues with them?
ARM: OMAP2+: CLEANUP: All OMAP2PLUS uses omap-device.o target so add
one entry
ARM: OMAP2+: CLEANUP: Move omap3 dpll ops to dpll3xxx.c
ARM: OMAP2+: CLEANUP: Remove unnecessary ifdef around
__omap2_set_globals
You can only drop last patch, on which Kevin had commented, rest all should
be merged.
ARM: OMAP2+: CLEANUP: Add new config option for different DPLL
Features
Please let me know if I am missing something.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list