[PATCH 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support

[Omar Ramirez Luna]

Hi Vaibhav,

Somehow I missed this mail.

On 2 May 2012 00:42, Bedia, Vaibhav <vaibhav.bedia at ti.com> wrote:
> Hi Omar,
>
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
>> To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.
>>
>> Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
>>
>
> I think the mailbox code needs a cleanup similar to what you
> had proposed earlier [1] before the device tree support is added.

I believe the cleanup needs to be there, but this is generic enough to
support DT as it is.

> We probably need to decide whether the number of mailbox sub-modules
> should be part of hwmod attribute or come from device tree.

All the data is currently coming from hwmod, so I don't see why this
must be split now between hwmod and DT, but I'm open for suggestions.

> IMO the
> static allocation of the mailboxes is better suited in the device-tree
> data.

If possible I wouldn't want to tie use case specifics to DT or hwmod,
the whole point for the cleanup was to allow a dynamic mailbox
allocation and not statically assign them.

Regards,

Omar