[PATCH 0/5] more clk-next fixes
Turquette, Mike
mturquette at ti.com
Tue May 8 13:33:10 EDT 2012
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:08:25PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> If no one complains about these then I'll commit them to clk-next and
>> (finally) send my pull request to Arnd.
>>
> On mach-mxs:
>
> Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org>
>
> Mike,
>
> I haven't seen too many outstanding comments on these patches, except
> the following one that Saravana put on clk-fixed-factor.c, which should
> be easy to fix.
>
> "
>> + return (parent_rate / fix->div) * fix->mult;
>
> Wouldn't multiplying and then dividing result in better accuracy?
> "
>
> Can you please quickly fix it and publish the patches on your clk-next,
> so that I can ask Arnd to pull my platform porting, on which mach-mxs
> device tree series depends.
I'll fix it up on my end and send the pull request to Arnd.
Regards,
Mike
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shawn
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list