[PATCH 02/13] ARM: OMAP5: Add minimal support for OMAP5430 SOC
Hiremath, Vaibhav
hvaibhav at ti.com
Tue May 8 01:49:13 EDT 2012
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 01:05:01, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> [120507 12:22]:
> > * Paul Walmsley <paul at pwsan.com> [120507 12:11]:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 4 May 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >
> > > > How about we add CONFIG_SOC_OMAP3PLUS in the clean-up series?
> > > > Then this becomes just:
> > > >
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP3PLUS
> > >
> > > We might want to consider having separate CONFIG_SOC_* values for each
> > > SoC. So rather than CONFIG_SOC_OMAP3PLUS, we'd have CONFIG_SOC_OMAP3430,
> > > CONFIG_SOC_OMAP3630, etc.
> >
> > Hmm but this would be in addition to the SOC specific options. The goal
> > is to cut down the ifdeffery needed all over the place to add new SoCs,
> > see the experimental patch I posted:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg67938.html
>
> Of course we could make this finer grained based on features
> like SOC_HAS_XYZ or SOC_HAS_OMAP3PLUS_PRMXYZBITS if you have some
> grouping like that in mind.
>
This is much better approach than both ARCH_OMAPx and SOC_OMAPxxxx.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list