[PATCH 1/6] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: protect the power domain state change by a mutex

Paul Walmsley paul at pwsan.com
Mon May 7 02:41:33 EDT 2012


Hi

On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, jean.pihet at newoldbits.com wrote:

> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet at ti.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet at ti.com>

This patch is missing a description, which would describe why this lock is 
needed and what it protects against.  Please add this.

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c          |    8 ++++++--
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h |    3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> index d0c1c96..6918a13 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> @@ -100,15 +100,17 @@ int omap_set_pwrdm_state(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, u32 pwrst)
>  	if (!pwrdm || IS_ERR(pwrdm))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&pwrdm->lock);
> +
>  	while (!(pwrdm->pwrsts & (1 << pwrst))) {
>  		if (pwrst == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
> -			return ret;
> +			goto out;
>  		pwrst--;
>  	}
>  
>  	next_pwrst = pwrdm_read_next_pwrst(pwrdm);
>  	if (next_pwrst == pwrst)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto out;
>  
>  	curr_pwrst = pwrdm_read_pwrst(pwrdm);
>  	if (curr_pwrst < PWRDM_POWER_ON) {
> @@ -141,6 +143,8 @@ int omap_set_pwrdm_state(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, u32 pwrst)
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&pwrdm->lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  

So this mutex would protect against simultaneous calls to 
omap_set_pwrdm_state(), but shouldn't this protection be extended to 
anything that would change the powerdomain's state?  For example, couldn't 
other calls to pwrdm_set_next_pwrst() race against this function?

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> index 96ad3dbe..319b277 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static int _pwrdm_register(struct powerdomain *pwrdm)
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwrdm->voltdm_node);
>  	voltdm_add_pwrdm(voltdm, pwrdm);
>  
> +	mutex_init(&pwrdm->lock);
>  	list_add(&pwrdm->node, &pwrdm_list);
>  
>  	/* Initialize the powerdomain's state counter */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h
> index 0d72a8a..6c6567d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/list.h>
> -
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/atomic.h>
>  
>  #include <plat/cpu.h>
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct powerdomain {
>  	struct clockdomain *pwrdm_clkdms[PWRDM_MAX_CLKDMS];
>  	struct list_head node;
>  	struct list_head voltdm_node;
> +	struct mutex lock;
>  	int state;
>  	unsigned state_counter[PWRDM_MAX_PWRSTS];
>  	unsigned ret_logic_off_counter;

Please add a kerneldoc entry in the struct powerdomain documentation for 
this field.


- Paul



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list