[PATCHv3 3/4] iommu/tegra: smmu: Refrain from accessing to AHB

Hiroshi Doyu hdoyu at nvidia.com
Thu May 3 13:54:31 EDT 2012


From: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/4] iommu/tegra: smmu: Refrain from accessing to AHB
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 19:48:25 +0200
Message-ID: <4FA2C4E9.2080509 at wwwdotorg.org>

> On 05/03/2012 10:05 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
> > Use "tegra_ahb_enable_smmu()" to inform AHB that SMMU is
> > ready, instead of directly aceessing AHB registers.
> 
> You need to make the Kconfig option for the SMMU either depend on or
> select the TEGRA_AHB option. If you don't, then if someone disables the
> AHB driver, the SMMU driver may still build, yet fail to link since the
> AHB API it calls doesn't exist.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> 
> > @@ -398,10 +388,8 @@ static void smmu_setup_regs(struct smmu_device *smmu)
> >  
> >  	smmu_flush_regs(smmu, 1);
> >  
> > -	val = ahb_read(smmu, AHB_XBAR_CTRL);
> > -	val |= AHB_XBAR_CTRL_SMMU_INIT_DONE_DONE <<
> > -		AHB_XBAR_CTRL_SMMU_INIT_DONE_SHIFT;
> > -	ahb_write(smmu, val, AHB_XBAR_CTRL);
> > +	err = tegra_ahb_enable_smmu(smmu->ahb);
> > +	return err;
> 
> You can just "return tegra_ahb_..." here.
> 
> > @@ -911,14 +899,16 @@ static int tegra_smmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 
> > +	smmu->ahb = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "ahb", 0);
> 
> Hmm, "ahb" should probably be "nvidia,ahb".
> 
> I see that neither this patch nor the next patch include binding
> documentation that describe this property. Can you please add documentation.

There will be the tegra Memory Controller(MC) patches following, which
will change the way DT is passed, where SMMU/dt is passed from
MC.

Can we wait for the following MC patches, not haveing doc for this
patch?



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list