[PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Thu May 3 11:12:53 EDT 2012
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 04:03:34PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static void mmci_dt_populate_generic_pdata(struct device_node *np,
> + struct mmci_platform_data *pdata)
> +{
> + int bus_width = 0;
> +
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "wp-gpios", &pdata->gpio_wp);
> + if (!pdata->gpio_wp)
> + pdata->gpio_wp = -1;
> +
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "cd-gpios", &pdata->gpio_cd);
> + if (!pdata->gpio_cd)
> + pdata->gpio_cd = -1;
> +
> + if (of_get_property(np, "cd-inverted", NULL))
> + pdata->cd_invert = true;
> + else
> + pdata->cd_invert = false;
> +
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "max-frequency", &pdata->f_max);
> + if (!pdata->f_max)
> + pr_warn("%s has no 'max-frequency' property\n", np->full_name);
> +
> + if (of_get_property(np, "mmc-cap-mmc-highspeed", NULL))
> + pdata->capabilities |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
> + if (of_get_property(np, "mmc-cap-sd-highspeed", NULL))
> + pdata->capabilities |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED;
> +
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "bus-width", &bus_width);
> + switch (bus_width) {
> + case 0 :
> + /* No bus-width supplied. */
> + break;
> + case 4 :
> + pdata->capabilities |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
> + break;
> + case 8 :
> + pdata->capabilities |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> + break;
> + default :
> + pr_warn("%s: Unsupported bus width\n", np->full_name);
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static int __devinit mmci_probe(struct amba_device *dev,
> const struct amba_id *id)
> {
> struct mmci_platform_data *plat = dev->dev.platform_data;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->dev.of_node;
> struct variant_data *variant = id->data;
> struct mmci_host *host;
> struct mmc_host *mmc;
> - int ret;
> + int ret, freeplat = 0;
> +
> + /* Must have platform data or Device Tree. */
> + if (!plat && !np) {
> + dev_err(&dev->dev, "No plat data or DT found\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> - /* must have platform data */
> if (!plat) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> + plat = kzalloc(sizeof(*plat), GFP_KERNEL);
I think this will leak memory - consider what happens if the driver gets
bound and unbound from the same device a number of times.
How about using devm_kzalloc() instead, so that when probe fails or the
driver is unbound, the memory is automatically freed? No need for that
freeplat variable either...
> + if (!plat)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + freeplat = 1;
> }
>
> + if (np)
> + mmci_dt_populate_generic_pdata(np, plat);
> +
> ret = amba_request_regions(dev, DRIVER_NAME);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> @@ -1448,6 +1505,9 @@ static int __devinit mmci_probe(struct amba_device *dev,
> rel_regions:
> amba_release_regions(dev);
> out:
> + if (freeplat)
> + kfree(plat);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list