[PATCH V3 2/8] clk: add a fixed factor clock
Viresh Kumar
viresh.kumar at st.com
Thu May 3 01:32:41 EDT 2012
On 5/3/2012 4:11 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> I will take this patch in before sending my request to Arnd. In your
> patch 0/8 you ask me to take in the series, but it looks like not all of
> the patches are going through me. For instance patch 2/8 certainly
> looks destined for Russell.
I think you only need to take this patch, i.e. 2/8.
Others will go through Arnd directly, keeping your branch as an dependency
branch for it.
> After fixing up this patch can you resend a clean series which is only
> headed for clk-next?
So, i would be sending this patch only after applying the last fixup
(hopefully :) ).
@Sascha: Please see if this patch is sufficient.
---
drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 9 ++++-----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
index 9afbdc4..8d25c2e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
@@ -37,16 +37,15 @@ static long clk_factor_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
{
struct clk_fixed_factor *fix = to_clk_fixed_factor(hw);
- if (prate) {
+ if (__clk_get_flags(hw->clk) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
unsigned long best_parent;
+
best_parent = (rate / fix->mult) * fix->div;
*prate = __clk_round_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk),
best_parent);
- return (*prate / fix->div) * fix->mult;
- } else {
- return (__clk_get_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk)) / fix->div) *
- fix->mult;
}
+
+ return (*prate / fix->div) * fix->mult;
}
static int clk_factor_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
--
viresh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list