[PATCH v4 02/39] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Adapt to HWMOD
Jon Hunter
jon-hunter at ti.com
Tue May 1 16:41:48 EDT 2012
Hi Afzal,
On 05/01/2012 07:19 AM, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> Create API for platforms to adapt gpmc to HWMOD
>
> Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed <afzal at ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> index 12916f3..c8d07bb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
>
> #include <plat/sdrc.h>
>
> +#include <plat/omap_device.h>
> +
> /* GPMC register offsets */
> #define GPMC_REVISION 0x00
> #define GPMC_SYSCONFIG 0x10
> @@ -276,6 +278,31 @@ unsigned int gpmc_round_ns_to_ticks(unsigned int time_ns)
> return ticks * gpmc_get_fclk_period() / 1000;
> }
>
> +int __init omap_init_gpmc(struct gpmc_pdata *pdata)
> +{
> + struct omap_hwmod *oh;
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + char *name = "omap-gpmc";
> + char *oh_name = "gpmc";
> +
> + pdata->clk_prd = gpmc_get_fclk_period();
Does this need to be done here? May be this should be done in the probe
function. You could store the handle to the main clk in the pdata.
> +
> + oh = omap_hwmod_lookup(oh_name);
> + if (!oh) {
> + pr_err("Could not look up %s\n", oh_name);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + pdev = omap_device_build(name, -1, oh, pdata,
> + sizeof(*pdata), NULL, 0, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
> + WARN(1, "Can't build omap_device for %s:%s.\n",
> + name, oh->name);
> + return PTR_ERR(pdev);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> #ifdef DEBUG
> static int set_gpmc_timing_reg(int cs, int reg, int st_bit, int end_bit,
> int time, const char *name)
> @@ -843,24 +870,19 @@ static __devinit void gpmc_mem_init(void)
>
> static int __init gpmc_init(void)
> {
> - int ret = -EINVAL;
> - char *ck = NULL;
> -
> - if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
> - ck = "core_l3_ck";
> - } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
> - ck = "gpmc_fck";
> - } else if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> - ck = "gpmc_ck";
> - }
> + char *oh_name = "gpmc";
> + struct omap_hwmod *oh;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(!ck))
> - return ret;
> + oh = omap_hwmod_lookup(oh_name);
> + if (!oh) {
> + pr_err("Could not look up %s\n", oh_name);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
>
> - gpmc_l3_clk = clk_get(NULL, ck);
> + gpmc_l3_clk = clk_get(NULL, oh->main_clk);
> if (IS_ERR(gpmc_l3_clk)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "Could not get GPMC clock %s\n", ck);
> - BUG();
> + pr_err("error: clk_get on %s\n", oh->main_clk);
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> clk_enable(gpmc_l3_clk);
I would have thought we should be able to remove the gpmc_init function
completely by now. Most of the code should be moved to the probe function.
Also now with hwmod in place, we should be able to remove the
clk_enable/disable functions and use the pm_runtime APIs instead.
Cheers
Jon
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list