[PATCH RFC] Simplify the Linux kernel by reducing its state space
Paul E. McKenney
paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sat Mar 31 12:54:01 EDT 2012
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 06:40:30PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 18:33, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Although there have been numerous complaints about the complexity of
> > parallel programming (especially over the past 5-10 years), the plain
> > truth is that the incremental complexity of parallel programming over
> > that of sequential programming is not as large as is commonly believed.
> > Despite that you might have heard, the mind-numbing complexity of modern
> > computer systems is not due so much to there being multiple CPUs, but
> > rather to there being any CPUs at all. In short, for the ultimate in
> > computer-system simplicity, the optimal choice is NR_CPUS=0.
> >
> > This commit therefore limits kernel builds to zero CPUs. This change
> > has the beneficial side effect of rendering all kernel bugs harmless.
> > Furthermore, this commit enables additional beneficial changes, for
> > example, the removal of those parts of the kernel that are not needed
> > when there are zero CPUs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> > ---
> >
> > alpha/Kconfig | 11 ++++++-----
> > arm/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> > blackfin/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> > hexagon/Kconfig | 9 +++++----
> > ia64/Kconfig | 9 +++++----
> > m32r/Kconfig | 10 ++++++----
> > mips/Kconfig | 21 +++++++++++----------
> > mn10300/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> > parisc/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> > powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype | 8 ++++----
> > s390/Kconfig | 12 +++++++-----
> > sh/Kconfig | 11 ++++++-----
> > sparc/Kconfig | 8 ++++----
> > tile/Kconfig | 9 +++++----
> > x86/Kconfig | 16 +++++++++-------
> > 15 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> You forgot to fix half of the architectures, a.o. m68k?
I must confess that I fixed only the SMP-capable architectures.
I of course would welcome additions for UP-only architectures.
Thanx, Paul
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list