[PATCH v12 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Change System MMU platform device definitions

[KyongHo Cho]

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com> wrote:
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyway Joerg, how do you want to handle this? Do you want to pick up
>>> 1/2/3 all of them in your tree? If so, 2nd patch should be on top of
>>> some samsung topic stuff.
>>
>>
>> Since patch 2 only applies to the Samsung tree, it is best to carry
>> this in your tree for merging. Feel free to add my Acked-by to patch 3.
>> But any further patches for the Exynos IOMMU drivers should go through
>> my tree after it is merged.
>>
>
> Hi Joerg,
>
> Now that 1st and 2nd can be applied cleanly into latest mainline. But
> unfortunately, I have no chance to send them to Linus now and I'm not sure
> you can do it during this merge window. If it is possible, please keep going
> on with my ack.
>
> KyongHo, just note, happens follwoing complaint with checkpatch, but I'm not
> sure this should be fixed right now. I think, if required, we can fix it
> later.
>
> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
> #698: FILE: arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-sysmmu.c:64:
>
> +#define DEFINE_SYSMMU_RESOURCE(core, mem, irq)                         \
> +       DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(core##_PA_SYSMMU_##mem, SZ_4K, #mem),      \
> +       DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(core##_IRQ_SYSMMU_##irq##_0, #mem)
>
DEFINE_SYSMMU_RESOURCE macro defines 2 array elements. The replacement string
must not be enclosed by parenthesis.

> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
> #702: FILE: arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-sysmmu.c:68:
>
> +#define SYSMMU_RESOURCE_DEFINE(core, ipname, mem, irq)                 \
> +       SYSMMU_RESOURCE(core, ipname) {                                 \
> +               DEFINE_SYSMMU_RESOURCE(core, mem, irq)                  \
> +       }
>
Ditto.

> WARNING: quoted string split across lines
> #914: FILE: arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-sysmmu.c:259:
>
> +                               pr_err("%s: Failed to add device resources
> for "
> +                                               "%s.%d\n", __func__,
>
It does not happened in the patch I posted and the email received also does
not have such problem. I wonder why the "pr_err(..." line is split into 2 lines.

Thank you for concerning :)

KyongHo.