[CPUFREQ] Fix exposure of ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ

[Kukjin Kim]

Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:35:49PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:17:30PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>>> On 02/13/12 18:49, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>>> From: Russell King<rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk>
>>>>>
>>>>> exynos4210-cpufreq.c is not buildable on non-exynos builds, so it's
>>>>> pointless allowing this option to be exposed.  Fix this by adding a
>>>>> dependency on ARCH_EXYNOS.
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c:20:29: error: mach/regs-clock.h:
>>> No such file or directory
>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c:21:26: error: mach/cpufreq.h: No
>>> such file or directory
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Russell King<rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk>
>>>>> Cc: Dave Jones<davej at redhat.com>
>>>>> Cc: cpufreq at vger.kernel.org
>>>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim at samsung.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm |    1 +
>>>>>    1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>>>>> index e0664fe..c8bde43 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>>>>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ
>>>>>
>>>>>    config ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ
>>>>>    	bool "Samsung EXYNOS4210"
>>>>> +	depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
>>>>>    	help
>>>>>    	  This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS4210
>>>>>    	  SoC (S5PV310 or S5PC210).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you're right. Should be added it.
>>>> BTW, how about following?
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>>>> index e0664fe..a5e0487 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>>>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ
>>>>            If in doubt, say N.
>>>>
>>>>   config ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ
>>>> -       bool "Samsung EXYNOS4210"
>>>> +       bool
>>>>          help
>>>>            This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS4210
>>>>            SoC (S5PV310 or S5PC210).
>>>>
>>>> I think, when selecting "ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ", "ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ"
>>>> will be selected on EXYNOS4210 with above changes.
>>>
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>>> I don't think so.  If you select this symbol you'll get a complaint
>>> that CPU_FREQ is not selected.
>>
>> Hmm..when I selected this symbol, I didn't get any warning about CPU_FREQ,
>> because the cpufreq/Kconfig.arm depends on CPU_FREQ. It means, when CPU_FREQ
>> is not selected, I can't select anything in cpufreq/Kconfig.arm.
>>
>>> What's probably much better is:
>>>
>> Yes, looks better than mine.
>>
>>> config ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ
>>> 	def_bool ARCH_EXYNOS
>>
>> But, should be...
>> 	def_bool CPU_EXYNOS4210
>>
>> Because the ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ is only for EXYNOS4210 and the
>> ARM_EXYNOS4X12_CPUFREQ will be added, actually submitted for other
>> SOC_EXYNOS4212 and SOC_EXYNOS4412.
>>
>>>
>>> because that ensures that if the CPU_FREQ dependencies change you don't
>>> have to update numerous places for that too.
>>
>> OK, I agree.
>>
>> So could you  please re-send/re-work this?
>
> As predicted, this is breaking other ARM platforms.  Please fix this
> yourself before your crappy code gets pushed into mainline.  Thanks.
>
I fixed it.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.