[RFC][PATCH 0/7] OMAP4 cpuidle cleanup
Jean Pihet
jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
Wed Mar 21 09:19:05 EDT 2012
Hi Santosh, Daniel,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
<santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
>> The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
>> driver itself.
>>
>> A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpuidle device is set for cpu0 only
>> and why the WFI is not used ?
>>
>> Daniel Lezcano (7):
>> ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove unused valid field
>> ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Declare the states with the driver declaration
>> ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove the cpuidle_params_table table
>> ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - fix static omap4_idle_data declaration
>> ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Initialize omap4_idle_data at compile time
>> ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - use the omap4_idle_data variable directly
>> ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - remove omap4_idle_data initialization at boot
>> time
>>
> The series looks fine to me in general. This clean-up is applicable
> for OMAP3 cpuidle code as well.
>
> I want Jean to look at this series because some of his earlier
> clean up has introduced those custom functions which
> are getting removed in this series.
I am OK with the patch set, I only have minor remarks to the individual patches.
Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet at ti.com>
>
> Regards
> santosh
>
>
Thanks!
Jean
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list