[PATCH v7 2/3] clk: introduce the common clock framework

[Turquette, Mike]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Saravana Kannan <skannan at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 03/15/2012 11:11 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>
>> The common clock framework defines a common struct clk useful across
>> most platforms as well as an implementation of the clk api that drivers
>> can use safely for managing clocks.
>>
>> The net result is consolidation of many different struct clk definitions
>> and platform-specific clock framework implementations.
>>
>> This patch introduces the common struct clk, struct clk_ops and an
>> implementation of the well-known clock api in include/clk/clk.h.
>> Platforms may define their own hardware-specific clock structure and
>> their own clock operation callbacks, so long as it wraps an instance of
>> struct clk_hw.
>>
>> See Documentation/clk.txt for more details.
>>
>> This patch is based on the work of Jeremy Kerr, which in turn was based
>> on the work of Ben Herrenschmidt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette at ti.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner<tglx at linutronix.de>
>> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn<andrew at lunn.ch>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring<rob.herring<at>  calxeda.com>
>> Cc: Russell King<linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
>> Cc: Jeremy Kerr<jeremy.kerr at canonical.com>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergman<arnd.bergmann at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Paul Walmsley<paul at pwsan.com>
>> Cc: Shawn Guo<shawn.guo at freescale.com>
>> Cc: Sascha Hauer<s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
>> Cc: Richard Zhao<richard.zhao at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Saravana Kannan<skannan at codeaurora.org>
>> Cc: Magnus Damm<magnus.damm at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Mark Brown<broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij at stericsson.com>
>> Cc: Stephen Boyd<sboyd at codeaurora.org>
>> Cc: Amit Kucheria<amit.kucheria at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Deepak Saxena<dsaxena at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Grant Likely<grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
>> ---
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Thanks for the patches! Glad to see that it's finally getting in! I sent a
> request for a minor change as a reply to the v5 series (since it had more
> context). Can you please take a look at that and let me know if you can send
> out a v8 or a patch on top of this to do that?

Hi Saravana,

I'm not sending a v8 series since Arnd has taken in v7 for the 3.4 merge window.

I'm formulating a reply to your v5 queries, but I'm not done looking
at the implications of the initializer stuff.  Lets keep the technical
discussion in that thread for now.

Regards,
Mike

>
> Thanks,
> Saravana
>
> --
> Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.