[PATCH v4 09/10] pwm: Add PXA support
Thierry Reding
thierry.reding at avionic-design.de
Fri Mar 16 04:29:34 EDT 2012
* Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:56:32PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at avionic-design.de>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - update PWM ops for changes in patch 2
> >
> > arch/arm/plat-pxa/Makefile | 1 -
> > arch/arm/plat-pxa/pwm.c | 304 --------------------------------------------
> > drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 9 ++
> > drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c | 244 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 305 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-pxa/pwm.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
> >
> The patch should be generated with "git format-patch -M", so that we
> can see the diff like below.
>
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-pxa/pwm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
Yes, Arnd already mentioned that in the last round but I forgot. It usually
takes me a couple of weeks to prepare the next version and I try to keep a
list of TODOs but that doesn't seem to be efficient enough yet.
> -int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> +static int pxa_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> {
> + struct pxa_pwm_chip *pc = to_pxa_pwm_chip(chip);
> unsigned long long c;
> unsigned long period_cycles, prescale, pv, dc;
> + unsigned long offset;
>
> - if (pwm == NULL || period_ns == 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
> + if (period_ns == 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> Then I will have a question why "pwm == NULL" check is removed?
Actually, as I mentioned in another mail the idea was to put these kinds of
checks into the core. They are still missing from the core, though.
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120316/208f5b30/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list