[PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: Samsung: Rework platform data of s3c-fb driver

Jingoo Han jg1.han at samsung.com
Thu Mar 15 04:39:58 EDT 2012



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darius Augulis [mailto:augulis.darius at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 5:27 PM
> To: Jingoo Han
> Cc: Thomas Abraham; linux-fbdev at vger.kernel.org; FlorianSchandinat at gmx.de; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; kgene.kim at samsung.com; ben-
> linux at fluff.org; patches at linaro.org; Kyungmin Park; JeongHyeon Kim; Heiko Stuebner; Kwangwoo Lee; Mark
> Brown; Peter Korsgaard; Maurus Cuelenaere
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: Samsung: Rework platform data of s3c-fb driver
> 
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han at samsung.com> wrote:
> 
> >> There is single board - mini6410 (or real6410) and it's name doesn't
> >> depend on connected LCD size.
> >> We know, that this board is available with different sizes of LCD and
> >> currently we have in kernel support for both sizes.
> >> It might be so, that it's implemented not in perfect way, but it was
> >> accepted and at least it's working.
> >
> >
> > I don't think so.
> > You argues that the wrong code should not be removed because it was accepted and at least it's working.
> > It is just wrong usage, which can just work.
> > Moreover, your code will make the problem, when 2~5 windows of FIMD IP are used.
> 
> Could please explain that? How does LCD feature selection for mini6410
> and real6410 break that?
> Timing for different sizes of LCD is located in two statically
> allocated structures which are used at board init time depending on
> kernel param line.
> Data from one of these structures is copied to s3c-fb platform data
> dynamically by board init code. Why it's a problem? What changes if
> platform data isn't rewritten dynamically?
> 
> > So, your code can be removed.
> 
> I don't think so. It does not break anything yet. One who make
> changes, should ensure backwards compatibility, at least talking about
> functionality and hardware (LCD) support, which was added few months
> ago. Remember, we talk about kernel parameters line - now it lets
> bootloader to select correct LCD size. After your changes, board with
> 7" LCD wont show anything.

OK, your code work, although the usage is wrong.

Thomas, can you keep backwards compatibility?


> 
> Darius A.




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list