Conflict between Versatile Express DT conversion and local timer updates
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Tue Mar 13 11:00:26 EDT 2012
On 13/03/12 14:33, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2012, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 13/03/12 11:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 13 March 2012, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>> On 13/03/12 10:15, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
>>> d) create a new next/timer branch in arm-soc that has Pawel's
>>> 98ed4ceb "ARM: vexpress: Get rid of MMIO_P2V" (the first patch from
>>> vexpress/dt, your patches and the ux500/timer series. Also put
>>> 98ed4ceb into the next/cleanup branch.
>>>
>>> Any of those will work for us, my preference would be on #4. I have
>>> created the next/timer branch in the arm-soc tree, so you can use
>>> that and either rebase your patches on top or merge your tree into
>>> it and fix up the merge conflicts.
>>
>> Thanks for doing that Arnd.
>>
>> I've thus created a new branch:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git
>> local_timers-for-arm-soc
>>
>> which contains the arm-soc next/timers branch as well as my local timers
>> series. I'd greatly appreciate if you could pull it for 3.4.
>>
>
> I've updated the next/timer branch with your changes now, but did not
> put it into the for-next branch because Olof is currently handling that.
>
> Olof, can you add it to for-next please? The timer branch should have
> no dependencies other than rmk/for-armsoc, so it can be fairly close to
> the start.
Thank you very much guys.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list