[PATCH v3 11/13] gpio/omap: fix dataout register overwrite in _set_gpio_dataout_*
DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
tarun.kanti at ti.com
Tue Mar 13 02:03:17 EDT 2012
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman at ti.com> wrote:
> Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti at ti.com> writes:
>
>> In the existing _set_gpio_dataout_*() implementation, the dataout
>> register is overwritten every time the function is called. This is
>> not intended behavior because that would end up one user of a GPIO
>> line overwriting what is written by another. Fix this so that previous
>> value is always preserved until explicitly changed by respective
>> user/driver of the GPIO line.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti at ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 3 +++
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> index 04c2677..2e8e476 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static void _set_gpio_dataout_reg(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int enable)
>> else
>> reg += bank->regs->clr_dataout;
>>
>> + l |= __raw_readl(bank->base + bank->regs->set_dataout);
>
> minor: IMO, it's more reader-friendly if this looks like
>
> l = __raw_read(...)
> l |= GPIO_BIT(...)
> __raw_write(...)
Agreed. I will make the change.
>
>> __raw_writel(l, reg);
>> bank->context.dataout = l;
>> }
>> @@ -130,6 +131,8 @@ static void _set_gpio_dataout_mask(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int enable)
>> l |= gpio_bit;
>> else
>> l &= ~gpio_bit;
>> +
>> + l |= __raw_readl(bank->base + bank->regs->set_dataout);
>
> There's already a __raw_read() in this function just above.
Right. Thanks.
--
Tarun
>
>> __raw_writel(l, reg);
>> bank->context.dataout = l;
>> }
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list