[PATCH v3 00/13] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes

DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.kanti at ti.com
Mon Mar 12 16:08:41 EDT 2012


On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:23 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
<tarun.kanti at ti.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman at ti.com> wrote:
>> Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti at ti.com> writes:
>>
>>> The cleanup is mostly getting rid of redundant fields in struct gpio_bank{}
>>> as we already have them as part of bank->context now. Also, remove un-used
>>> variable from gpio_irq_handler.
>>>
>>> The fixes include correction of _set_gpio_irqenable() implementation,
>>> missing wakeup_en register update in set_gpio_wakeup(), type mismatch
>>> of gpio trigger parameter in set_gpio_trigger(), incorrect dataout
>>> register update in set_gpio_dataout_() and few corrections in context
>>> save logic.
>>>
>>> It is baselined on top of Kevin's following series:
>>> gpio/omap: cleanup and runtime PM conversion for v3.4
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git for_3.4/gpio/runtime-pm-cleanup
>>>
>>> Series is available here for reference:
>>> git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev for_3.4/gpio_further_cleanup_fixes
>>
>> This branch doesn't exist.
> Oops... I am sorry.
> I was in the process of updating the branch with latest comments after
> base-lining on Grant's:
> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git
> Branch: gpio/next
> Because this has all the gpio changes including Benoit's latest gpio
> devicetree changes.
> Should I go ahead?
Anyways, for the time being I am updating on top of your changes as before.
You should be able to see the branch shortly.
--
Tarun
>>
>> Kevin
>>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list