[PATCH v3 12/13] gpio/omap: fix incorrect context restore logic in omap_gpio_runtime_resume
Shilimkar, Santosh
santosh.shilimkar at ti.com
Thu Mar 8 02:19:15 EST 2012
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:58 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
<tarun.kanti at ti.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
> <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 07 March 2012 12:16 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
>>> In omap_gpio_runtime_resume() the context restore should be independent
>>> of bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios. This was preventing context restore
>>> of GPIO lines which are not wakeup enabled.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Govindraj Raja <govindraj.raja at ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti at ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> index 2e8e476..ccfbae0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> @@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@ static int omap_gpio_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>>> __raw_writel(bank->context.risingdetect,
>>> bank->base + bank->regs->risingdetect);
>>>
>>> - if (!bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios || !bank->workaround_enabled) {
>>> + if (!bank->workaround_enabled) {
>> This doesn't seem to be right.
>> Don't you want to avoid GPIO restore for banks which are in
>> always on domain. Infact the purpose of "enabled_non_wakeup_gpios"
>> is exactly that ? Isn't it.
>>
>> What am I missing ?
> The bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios is set whenever a gpio line is programmed
> as edge trigger as shown below.
> (This is not meant to distinguish between gpios in WKUP domain vs
> those in PER domain).
> The context restore should happen irrespective of whether the trigger
> type is edge or level.
> In fact context restore was not happening for a gpio line because of
> this condition while
> testing suspend/resume.
>
> [...]
> if (trigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
> bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios |= gpio_bit;
> else
> bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios &= ~gpio_bit;
> [...]
Make sense now. Thanks for clarification Tarun.
You can add mine..
Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
Regards
Santosh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list