[PATCH 6/6] ARM: at91: add Shutdown Controller (SHDWC) DT support

[Rob Herring]

On 03/07/2012 12:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 March 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> On 20:24 Fri 02 Mar     , Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Friday 02 March 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "atmel,at91sam9x5-shdwc")) {
>>>> +               have_rtt = false;
>>>> +               have_rtc = true;
>>>> +       } else if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "atmel,at91sam9rl-shdwc")) {
>>>> +               have_rtt = true;
>>>> +               have_rtc = true;
>>>> +       } else {
>>>> +               have_rtt = true;
>>>> +               have_rtc = false;
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       if (have_rtc && of_property_read_bool(np, "atmel,wakeup-rtc-timer"))
>>>> +                       mode |= AT91_SHDW_RTCWKEN;
>>>> +
>>>> +       if (have_rtt && of_property_read_bool(np, "atmel,wakeup-rtt-timer"))
>>>> +                       mode |= AT91_SHDW_RTTWKEN;
>>>> +
>>>> +       at91_shdwc_write(AT91_SHDW_MR, wakeup_mode | mode);
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Hi Jean-Christophe,
>>>
>>> I don't understand why you check the specific part here. Isn't it enough to
>>> check the property when you already mandate that they can only be present
>>> on devices that support the specific wakeup?
>>>
>>> If there is a good explanation for that, maybe add a code comment why it's
>>> required.
>> some wake update source exist on few soc and we are not supposed to set the
>> bit otherwise
>>
> 
> I still don't understand: Doesn't the property already give the information?
> In general, you should try to encode these things in specific properties instead of
> checking the compatible property.
> 

Or vice-versa, the compatible properties distinguish things enough that
the property is not needed. If it is fixed in the SOC design, then you
should distinguish things with the compatible property.

Rob

> 	Arnd
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel