[PATCH 8/8] ARM: tegra: HACK: remove set_irq_flags() from driver
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Thu Mar 1 15:54:08 EST 2012
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:33:03PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Alan Ott <alan at signal11.us> wrote:
>
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> >
> > The driver should not call set_irq_flags itself, and
> > cannot do this from a loadable module.
> >
> > Remove the call for now, which might break the driver
> > but at least lets the kernel link again.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c | 1 -
> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
> > index dbc7fe8..ab91f26 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
> > @@ -729,7 +729,6 @@ static int tegra_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > err = -ENODEV;
> > goto fail;
> > }
> > - set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
>
> The kernel is full of this kind of stuff (drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c):
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> /* ARM requires an extra step to clear IRQ_NOREQUEST, which it
> * sets on behalf of every irq_chip. Also sets IRQ_NOPROBE.
> */
> set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
> #else
> /* same effect on other architectures */
> irq_set_noprobe(irq);
> #endif
>
> Can't we try to fix this for real instead of breaking the universe,
> hehe :-)
That depends whether you want 0..NR_IRQS to all be request-able before
they've been setup with their irq chips and handlers etc.
Unfortunately, genirq doesn't provide a standard helper to clear
IRQ_NOREQUEST, and that's why this pain persists.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list