[PATCH 3/3] mtd: gpmi: change the code for clocks

Shawn Guo shawn.guo at linaro.org
Fri Jun 29 07:13:36 EDT 2012

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 05:54:33PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > > > No, that's silly. You would have to change the driver for each
> > > > new platform that the driver can support.
> > > > 
> > > If the new platform is fully compatible with exist platforms, then no.
> > > If need more clocks, then in either way, we have to add support in driver.
> > > 
> > Even if it had fewer clocks you would have to change the driver!
> > 
> Yes.
> For your case, you need create some dummy clock, right?
> If yes, i would intend to explictly to define it for a new type
> of IP.
I'm with Lothar on this.  At least for imx28 case, we do not even need
dummy clock, because NULL con_id in clkdev lookup will have all those
clocks match the only one gpmi-nand clock on imx28, as I already said.


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list