[PATCH] [RESEND] arm: limit memblock base address for early_pte_alloc
nicolas.pitre at linaro.org
Thu Jun 28 13:50:16 EDT 2012
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Err, I don't think you understand what's going on here.
> The sequence is:
> 1. setup the initial mappings so we can run the kernel in virtual space.
> 2. provide the memory areas to memblock
> 3. ask the platform to reserve whatever memory it wants from memblock
> [this means using memblock_reserve or arm_memblock_steal). The
> reserved memory is *not* expected to be mapped at this point, and is
> therefore inaccessible.
> 4. Setup the lowmem mappings.
I do understand that pretty well so far.
> And when we're setting up the lowmem mappings, we do *not* expect to
> create any non-section page mappings, which again means we have no reason
> to use the memblock allocator to obtain memory that we want to immediately
And why does this have to remain so?
> So I don't know where you're claim of being "fragile" is coming from.
It doesn't come from anything you've described so far. It comes from
those previous attempts at lifting this limitation. I think that my
proposal is much less fragile than the other ones.
> What is fragile is people wanting to use arm_memblock_steal() without
> following the rules for it I layed down.
What about enhancing your rules if the technical limitations they were
based on are lifted?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel