RF231 transceiver on at91sam9g20ek board
Alexander Smirnov
alex.bluesman.smirnov at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 03:47:43 EDT 2012
Hi,
2012/6/22 Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>:
> On Wednesday 20 June 2012, Alexander Smirnov wrote:
>> I'm the developer of the IEEE 802.15.4 kernel branch, and currently
>> I've faced with the problem regarding mach-at91 arch and hope you can
>> advise me.
>>
>> I've been working with at86rf231 transceiver (RF231 extender)
>> connected via SPI to at91sam9g20ek board. The driver works and tested
>> for kernels up to 3.1 version (versions 3.2-latest haven't ever been
>> tested yet).
>> Several days ago I've ported the IEEE802.15.4 stack to the latest
>> kernel and see some strange things: RF231 interrupt handler is
>> permanently pulled right after driver's probe method (the RF231 chip
>> is in disabled mode, so it can't generate interrupts at that moment).
>> Also I've noticed that each ENTER key pressing in minicom generates a
>> new interrupt. It looks like somebody else uses the same pin/pins for
>> its needs...
>>
>> Do you have any ideas what can be changed since 3.1 kernel that this
>> problem arose.
>>
>
> It might not be the problem you are faced with but note that at91
> is moving towards probing all devices using the device tree, so
> starting with linux-3.4 you should be defining the device in the
> at91sam9g20ek.dts file for your board and use the generic
> board-dt.c file. The platform_data gets replaced with
> calls to of_get_gpio() in that case.
Thank you for the reply!
Are you going to add SPI section to the device tree in the nearest
future or I can do it by myself and send you the patch? The reason is
that this week I merged at86rf230 driver to the 'net-next' tree, but
it won't work without platform data.
Alex
>
> Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list