[PATCHv10 1/7] I2C: OMAP: I2C register restore only if context is lost
shubhrajyoti at ti.com
Tue Jun 26 07:23:21 EDT 2012
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 11:38 AM, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
> On Monday 25 June 2012 06:00 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman at ti.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti at ti.com>
>> how will this ever work with DT ?
> What you say makes sense however that is what currently
> most of the omap drivers do.
> Will check on this.
>> I say we get rid of the OMAP-specific
>> API and build this "context lost" status directly on dev_pm_info and
>> have something like pm_runtime_lost_context() or something with pm QoS
>> tell you if a device has lost its context.
>> Also, your commit log doesn't really state any problems you might have
>> reached before,
Didnt see any issues while reviewing found that the restore was done always.
>> or any improvements wrt latency coming out of suspend
>> and so on.
I am only restoring only 4-5 registers.
>> IMHO, drivers need a generic way to differentiate if they're resuming
>> from OFF or RET, otherwise we will end up with a bunch of OMAP-specific
>> hackery on all drivers
More information about the linux-arm-kernel