[PATCH v4] usb: chipidea: permit driver bindings pass phy pointer

[Richard Zhao]

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:46:26AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 08:46:24AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:52:57AM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > > Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> > > 
> > > > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:37:06PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > >> Sometimes, the driver bindings may know what phy they use.
> > > >> For example, when using device tree, the usb controller may have a
> > > >> phandler pointing to usb phy.
> > > >> 
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao at freescale.com>
> > > >> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> > > >> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
> > > >> ---
> > > >> Changes since laster version:
> > > >> - hcd transceiver renamed to phy
> > > >
> > > > Ick, I see patches all over this thread, and other threads, and I have
> > > > no idea what to apply anywhere...
> > > >
> > > > So, consider all chipidea patches dropped from my queue now, can you
> > > > please resend them to me, with the accumulated acks and reviewed-by
> > > > line, so that I can queue them up?
> > > 
> > > So will you pick these patches to your tree or should I apply them to
> > > mine or what is the plan? I kind of have a tree [1] for chipidea stuff
> > > where I have been collecting patches, to send a pull request to you for
> > > 3.6.
> > 
> > I do not accept pull requests for this code, sorry, I need patches in
> > email.  You and Richard work it out how you are going to handle this and
> > then, send me patches that you both agree on.
> So, Alex, Could you send out patch you queued? And I'll send out v6
> patch series which depends on that. Is it ok for driver part?
All right, I'll send out all.

Thanks
Richard
> 
> For arm platform part, it may need further discussion.
> 
> Thanks
> Richard
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h