[PATCH] pinctrl: pinctrl-imx: fix map setting problem if NO_PAD_CTL

[Hui Wang]

Dong Aisheng wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:41:41PM +0800, Hui Wang wrote:
>   
>> new_map is allocated according to map_num instead of grp->npins,
>> if a pin or some pins of a group has NO_PAD_CTL property, the map_num
>> and the grp->npin are different definitely.
>>
>> When we set mapping information to the new_map[], we should skip those
>> pins with NO_PAD_CTL from index, otherwise it is possible the driver
>> will aceesss to a unallocated region.
>>
>>     
> Good catching.
> Thanks.
>
>   
>> Cc: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <jason77.wang at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> This problem is easily reproduced if we set pinctrl in the
>> ${board}.dts like following:
>> fsl,pins = <pin_func_id1   config_with_NO_PAD_CTL
>>             pin_func_id2   config_with_NO_PAD_CTL
>>             pin_func_id3   config_normal>;
>>
>>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c | 9 +++++----
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c
>> index dd6d93a..0e21abb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c
>> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ static int imx_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>>  	struct pinctrl_map *new_map;
>>  	struct device_node *parent;
>>  	int map_num = 1;
>> +	int map_pos = 0;
>>  	int i;
>>  
>>  	/*
>> @@ -186,11 +187,11 @@ static int imx_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>>  	new_map++;
>>  	for (i = 0; i < grp->npins; i++) {
>>  		if (!(grp->configs[i] & IMX_NO_PAD_CTL)) {
>> -			new_map[i].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN;
>> -			new_map[i].data.configs.group_or_pin =
>> +			new_map[map_pos].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN;
>> +			new_map[map_pos].data.configs.group_or_pin =
>>  					pin_get_name(pctldev, grp->pins[i]);
>> -			new_map[i].data.configs.configs = &grp->configs[i];
>> -			new_map[i].data.configs.num_configs = 1;
>> +			new_map[map_pos].data.configs.configs = &grp->configs[i];
>> +			new_map[map_pos++].data.configs.num_configs = 1;
>>     
> I'm ok with the change, only a minor comment:
> Does the change as follows look better?
>   
It is fine to me. Do you need me to prepare a new patch as your suggestion?

Regards,
Hui.
> -       for (i = 0; i < grp->npins; i++) {
> +       for (i = j = 0; i < grp->npins; i++) {
>                 if (!(grp->configs[i] & IMX_NO_PAD_CTL)) {
> -                       new_map[i].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN;
> -                       new_map[i].data.configs.group_or_pin =
> +                       new_map[j].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN;
> +                       new_map[j].data.configs.group_or_pin =
>                                         pin_get_name(pctldev, grp->pins[i]);
> -                       new_map[i].data.configs.configs = &grp->configs[i];
> -                       new_map[i].data.configs.num_configs = 1;
> +                       new_map[j].data.configs.configs = &grp->configs[i];
> +                       new_map[j].data.configs.num_configs = 1;
> +                       j++;
>
> Regards
> Dong Aisheng
>
>
>